Oil is the most energy-dense and efficient fuel that can be delivered to consumers.
This claim is accurate based on available evidence.
Full Analysis
Detailed examination of the evidence
Context#
Critics of oil often focus on emissions while ignoring why oil became dominant in the first place: nothing else comes close to matching its combination of energy density, storability, transportability, and cost-effectiveness.
Evidence#
Energy Density: Oil Wins by a Landslide
Energy per kilogram (MJ/kg):
| Fuel | Energy Density |
|---|---|
| Gasoline | 46 MJ/kg |
| Diesel | 45 MJ/kg |
| Jet fuel | 43 MJ/kg |
| Natural gas | 55 MJ/kg (but requires pressurization) |
| Lithium-ion battery | 0.9 MJ/kg |
| Hydrogen (compressed) | 5.6 MJ/kg (tank weight included) |
What this means:
- A lithium battery holds ~50x less energy per kg than gasoline
- A 60L gas tank = ~2,200 MJ of energy, weighs ~45 kg
- Equivalent battery pack = ~2,400 kg (the weight of a small car)
- This is physics, not politics
Why Energy Density Matters
For vehicles:
- More range per unit of weight
- Faster refueling (minutes vs. hours)
- No range anxiety
- Works in extreme cold and heat
For aviation:
- Jet fuel is the only viable option for commercial flight
- Batteries would need to be 50x better to work
- A battery-powered 737 couldn't take off—the batteries would be too heavy
- No alternative exists, even theoretically, for long-haul flight
For shipping:
- Container ships carry months of fuel
- Battery-powered ships would need constant recharging
- 90% of global trade depends on oil-powered vessels
Storage: The Hidden Advantage
Oil can be:
- Stored indefinitely without degradation
- Kept in simple tanks (no special conditions)
- Stockpiled for emergencies (strategic reserves)
- Transported without energy loss
Batteries:
- Degrade over time even when not used
- Require climate control
- Lose capacity with age
- Fire risk in storage
Hydrogen:
- Leaks through most containers
- Requires extreme compression or cryogenic cooling
- Embrittles metal containers
- Boils off over time in liquid form
Transport Efficiency
Moving oil:
- Pipelines: 99%+ efficiency, lowest cost
- Tanker ships: Massive quantities, minimal energy
- Rail/truck: Existing infrastructure everywhere
Moving electricity:
- Transmission losses: 5-10% over distance
- Requires massive infrastructure investment
- Cannot be "shipped" across oceans
- Grid bottlenecks limit delivery
Moving hydrogen:
- Requires 3x the energy to compress/transport as it delivers
- Pipeline infrastructure doesn't exist
- Truck transport extremely inefficient
- Losses at every stage
Refueling: Time Is Money
Fill a car with 400 miles of range:
- Gasoline: 3 minutes
- Fast EV charging: 30-60 minutes
- Standard EV charging: 8-12 hours
For commercial vehicles:
- A truck driver can refuel and go
- An EV truck loses productive hours charging
- Fleet economics heavily favor diesel
Cost to Consumer
Delivered energy cost (approximate):
- Gasoline: $0.03-0.05 per MJ
- Residential electricity: $0.05-0.10 per MJ
- Hydrogen: $0.15-0.30 per MJ (where available)
Oil delivers more energy for less money through existing infrastructure that's already paid for.
The Infrastructure Reality
Oil infrastructure:
- 150,000+ gas stations in North America
- Millions of miles of pipelines
- Refineries in every region
- Built over 100+ years, fully amortized
Replacing it would require:
- Trillions in new investment
- Decades of construction
- Entirely new supply chains
- Higher consumer costs during transition
Why Alternatives Struggle
Batteries:
- Physics limits energy density
- Improvements are incremental (3-5% annually)
- No breakthrough on horizon to match oil
- Mining requirements are enormous
Hydrogen:
- Most hydrogen is made FROM oil/gas
- "Green" hydrogen requires massive electricity
- Infrastructure essentially doesn't exist
- Efficiency losses at every step
Biofuels:
- Compete with food production
- Land use requirements enormous
- Energy return much lower than oil
- Cannot scale to replace petroleum
Analysis#
This claim is true. Oil's dominance isn't an accident of history or a conspiracy—it's physics and economics. Nothing matches oil's combination of:
- Energy density (50x better than batteries)
- Storability (indefinite, simple conditions)
- Transportability (pipelines, ships, trucks)
- Refueling speed (minutes, not hours)
- Cost (cheapest delivered energy)
- Infrastructure (already built, everywhere)
This is why oil powers 97% of transportation despite decades of alternatives. It's why planes fly on jet fuel and ships burn diesel. It's why your car can drive 400 miles on a tank that takes 3 minutes to fill.
Alternatives may eventually improve—but they're competing against a fuel that nature spent millions of years perfecting. Oil is liquid energy, easily stored, cheaply transported, and quickly transferred. It's not just the best fuel we have; it's the best fuel physics allows for chemical energy storage.
Understanding this isn't "pro-oil propaganda." It's respecting the reality that engineers and economists have understood for over a century. Any honest energy transition plan must acknowledge why oil is so hard to replace—and be realistic about how long it will take.