Transitioning away from oil will create more jobs than it destroys.
This claim is largely inaccurate, though it may contain a kernel of truth.
Full Analysis
Detailed examination of the evidence
Context#
Proponents of rapid energy transition claim that "green jobs" will replace oil and gas employment. The evidence suggests this is wishful thinking, especially for Canada.
Evidence#
What Oil & Gas Jobs Pay
Average annual earnings:
- Oil & gas extraction: $120,000+
- Pipeline transportation: $100,000+
- Petroleum refining: $95,000+
- National average (all industries): $59,000
These are among the highest-paying jobs in Canada, often in communities with few alternatives.
The "Green Jobs" Reality
Typical renewable energy wages:
- Solar panel installation: $45,000-55,000
- Wind turbine technician: $50,000-60,000
- Energy efficiency auditor: $50,000-65,000
Even where jobs are "created," they often:
- Pay 40-50% less than oil & gas jobs
- Offer fewer benefits and less job security
- Require workers to relocate to different regions
- Are often temporary construction jobs, not permanent operations
Geographic Mismatch
Oil and gas jobs are concentrated in:
- Alberta (major production)
- Saskatchewan (heavy oil, potash)
- British Columbia (natural gas)
- Newfoundland & Labrador (offshore)
- Northern and rural communities
Renewable energy jobs tend to be in:
- Urban manufacturing centers
- Southern Ontario and Quebec
- Locations with different skill requirements
Telling a Fort McMurray pipefitter to become a Toronto solar installer isn't a "transition"—it's displacement.
The Numbers Don't Add Up
Canadian oil & gas employment:
- 600,000+ direct and indirect jobs
- $100+ billion in annual GDP
- $20+ billion in government revenues
Promised "green" replacements:
- Government projections consistently overestimate
- Many "green jobs" already exist and aren't new
- Subsidies required to make projects viable
- Jobs often temporary (construction phase)
Real-World Examples
Germany's Energiewende:
- Spent €500+ billion on energy transition
- Electricity prices among highest in Europe
- Still depends heavily on imported gas
- Coal phase-out required compensation packages
Alberta's Coal Transition:
- Thousands of coal workers displaced
- Promised retraining programs underdelivered
- Many workers took early retirement, not new jobs
- Communities still struggling years later
What Workers Actually Want
Surveys of energy workers show:
- Most want to continue in their field
- Skepticism about "retraining" promises
- Concern about wage and benefit cuts
- Preference for stable, long-term employment
Analysis#
This claim is mostly false. While some renewable energy jobs will be created, they won't replace oil and gas employment in terms of quantity, quality, or location.
The math doesn't work: you cannot replace $120,000/year jobs with $50,000/year jobs and call it progress. You cannot move jobs from Alberta to Ontario and tell displaced workers their sacrifice is for the greater good. You cannot promise "just transition" while dismantling the industry that funds the social programs meant to help.
Energy workers see through these promises because they've watched them fail before. The honest answer is that rapid transition would devastate communities and families—and no amount of retraining programs or talking points changes that reality.